<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If it&#8217;s about Search 3.0, shouldn&#8217;t it be Google Cubed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecontentguy.net/blog/2009/05/20/if-its-about-search-30-shouldnt-it-be-google-cubed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecontentguy.net/blog/2009/05/20/if-its-about-search-30-shouldnt-it-be-google-cubed/</link>
	<description>all things unstructured</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:18:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike&#8217;s Digital Laboratory :: The new way is already old</title>
		<link>http://thecontentguy.net/blog/2009/05/20/if-its-about-search-30-shouldnt-it-be-google-cubed/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike&#8217;s Digital Laboratory :: The new way is already old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecontentguy.net/blog/?p=277#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] And  Paul, (The Content Guy) is quick to reminds us that we should all calm down because Google Squared is not the same as Wolfram alpha., and therefore should not be compared head to head and presented as an either/or choice.  Indeed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And  Paul, (The Content Guy) is quick to reminds us that we should all calm down because Google Squared is not the same as Wolfram alpha., and therefore should not be compared head to head and presented as an either/or choice.  Indeed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
